Skip to main content

Winging it — People who master it make you believe that they are following its definition

What does “winging it” mean? We all have done it, but do we master it?
Definition:
To wing it is an idiom that means to improvise, to do something without proper preparation or time to rehearse. People often talk about winging it when they have to do something difficult that they didn’t have time to prepare — like a make speech or give a presentation.
Those who are regularly successful in it are actually memorizing their speeches and the facts from the speech. They practice and practice. Then when the actual meeting or speech or presentation comes, they have the confidence because in the worst case, you memorized everything and you can go by the script. With that confidence, you find opportunities during your presentation to be more natural and that natural behavior keeps your audience engaged; some may say that you are winging it and that you are very good in it but I call it “being very prepared”.
Don’t think that this only applies to your senior management team. This applies to everybody in your organization whether you are in a meeting with 3, 5, 10 or more people.
Try it in your next meeting. Carefully read the agenda for the meeting and come very prepared. Then when you are in this meeting, keep your laptop, notebook and your smartphone away and pay attention to all the discussions. You will be very natural and your points will come across much stronger.
Conclusion:
Those who you perceive as great in winging it, they actually rehearse and go against the definition of “winging it”.
Thank you for reading this article. Please follow me here or you can also find my articles at http://www.almirsCorner.com
Almir Mustafic



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Brand New programming language and one solution OR …

Brand New programming language and one solution OR Two existing programming languages, one solution for EACH? I understand that there is no right or wrong. It all depends on your software architecture, team structure, team skills and other factors, but I still want to explain the scenario as it may look familiar to some. Let me explain. Let’s assume that you have microservices and common libraries in two major programming languages. You have some teams who are experts in one and some teams experts in the other programming language. Now you need to come up with a solution for a scenario that all teams will need to leverage. Let’s assume that your cloud platform has an off-the-shelf approach for this but it is supported by a 3rd programming language that your teams do not have much experience in. What is the right thing for your organization and not just from the technical point of view? A) Do you embrace what your cloud platform gives you off the shelf and implement thi...

AMAZON WORKSPACES

AMAZON WORKSPACES. I am not sure how many of you have heard of Amazon WorkSpaces. Let me give you some information and my analysis after using it for some time. What is it? It is the Amazon’s solution to desktops in the cloud. What’s the point? Well, if you want to use a basic less powerful laptop or even use a Chromebook as your daily computer, then you will not be missing the full functionality of a powerful Windows 10 machine. For example, you can use your Chromebook to connect to your Amazon WorkSpace machine and then you get the full Windows 10 experience. The point is that it gives you the experience as if your remote/workspace Windows 10 machine is really part of your Chromebook. Where it makes the most sense is using Chromebooks to connect to your Amazon WorkSpace machine as Chromebooks with Chrome OS are fast for anything you do in the browser and they are very secure; Chromebooks are also generally cheaper than other laptops. Just a thought as an alternative to buying ful...

Owning and improving what you have is a sign of maturity in software engineering — Is it?

Re-factoring vs. Re-Writing? A lot of times we heard the talks about “Never be satisfied” in the context of innovation and driving your teams forward. In that context, this is totally fine, but when this mindset gets blindly used in the software engineering low level details, then you could be constantly  re-writing  code without taking the effort to truly understand it. Is this the right thing for business? Is it costly? Re-factoring  means that you took time to understand what you have, and you are improving it. On the other hand,  re-writing  does not necessarily mean that you took the time to understand the low-level details; it may mean that you went back to requirements and decided to re-write it without trying to understand the low-level details. There could be something in those details that you need to know so you don’t make the same mistake again in the process of re-writing it. At the end of the day, if you are constantly re-writing code, t...