Owning and improving what you have is a sign of maturity in software engineering

Owning and improving what you have is a sign of maturity in software engineering — Is it?

Re-factoring vs. Re-Writing?

A lot of times we heard the talks about “Never be satisfied” in the context of innovation and driving your teams forward.

In that context, this is totally fine, but when this mindset gets blindly used in the software engineering low level details, then you could be constantly re-writing code without taking the effort to truly understand it. Is this the right thing for business? Is it costly?

Re-factoring means that you took time to understand what you have, and you are improving it.

On the other hand, re-writing does not necessarily mean that you took the time to understand the low-level details; it may mean that you went back to requirements and decided to re-write it without trying to understand the low-level details. There could be something in those details that you need to know so you don’t make the same mistake again in the process of re-writing it.

At the end of the day, if you are constantly re-writing code, then there is no sense of ownership. Just put yourself in the shoes of the person who wrote some code that can be improved with some re-factoring and you still decide to re-write it. A few months later you may be in the position of that person where somebody else decides to re-write your code. How do we decide to draw the line because there is still business to support?

Please think about this as you are going through the existing code and consult with your tech leads and solutions architects. Let’s achieve the balance of re-factoring and re-writing.

Until next time,

Almir Mustafic

Comments

Teaching kids the importance of information security — A simple fun example with encoding/decoding

Teaching kids about information security is very important today because the social network websites and applications are blurring the line between what should be shared securely and what not. Everybody is busy over-sharing the good, bad and ugly over the internet and in the process of doing that forgetting the basics of information security or never taking the time to learn it. Or is it that nobody is introducing these concepts in school? It is something that needs to be introduced in our education systems from early days. Do you remember the days when we used to send those short messages on a piece of paper in our classrooms? Some encoded those messages because you did not want another person in the middle to open it and understand what it says. How were those messages encoded? The simplest example is: You create a simple mapping for each letter and number in the alphabet. Then you encode your message and write it on a piece of paper. Then the person on the other end decodes...

Daylight saving time and A Software Engineering state of mind ?

You may be wondering what the Daylight saving time has to do with a software engineering state of mind. When thinking about writing this article, at first I thought to start with the following joke and I am: “ Did you know that the Daylight saving time was started because a software developer coded a function that does smart timezone and configurable calculations and then this developer created a problem to solve to use the algorithm; hence, the Daylight saving time was born. ” This is a joke, but on a more serious note , this brings me to a state of mind in software engineering that make this joke a reality to some degree. How many times did we find ourselves in situations where we learned something new in programming and we looked for ways to apply it at any cost? How many times did we see a cool new feature from a creator of a framework and we decided to use it even though that was not the right solution for the problem or maybe there was no problem to solve in the ...

Language of Software Engineers and scrum-master skills (quick thoughts)

Language of software engineers and skills of scrum-masters? All software developers speak the same language and that is pseudo-code :) However, there are still communication issues among software engineers specifically with other teams. That's where the role of great scrum-masters fits in. That great scrum-master does not necessarily need to be technical but he/she needs to have the skills of hearing roadblocks that engineers communicate in their technical language. I said "hearing" and hearing is not the same as listening. Listening is just a pre-requisite for hearing. Once you hear it, now you need to know how to action it and mobilize the right people. Coaching comes along with all of this, but that is a separate topic because it is also a responsibility of the tech manager. These skills separate great scrum-masters from others. Almir Mustafic P.S. Disclaimer: On any given day, I wear a hat of a solutions architect, engineer, scrum-master and tech manager.

Software Engineering Blogger

Search This Blog